JCAHO 2025 Monthly Credential Monitoring Requirements: Complete Compliance Checklist

If you manage credentialing for a healthcare organization, you already know the stakes are high. A single lapsed license or missed exclusion can trigger patient safety risks, regulatory penalties, and millions in lost reimbursements.

Now, the stakes just got higher. JCAHO monthly credential monitoring is no longer a best practice — it’s a mandate. The Joint Commission’s updated 2025 standards require healthcare organizations to shift from periodic re-verification cycles to continuous, monthly monitoring of professional credentials.

For many credentialing teams, this represents a massive operational shift. If your current process relies on manual spreadsheets, annual re-checks, or batch verifications every few months, you’re facing a gap that needs to close fast.

This comprehensive guide breaks down what the new JCAHO 2025 requirements actually say, why they matter, and — most importantly — gives you a step-by-step compliance checklist to get your program ready.

Table of Contents

What Changed: The JCAHO 2025 Monthly Monitoring Mandate

Historically, many healthcare organizations verified practitioner credentials on a cycle — often every two or three years during the reappointment process. Some organizations performed interim checks, but there was no explicit requirement for monthly monitoring.

The 2025 update changes that. The Joint Commission now expects organizations to perform monthly re-verification of key credentials for all privileged practitioners and applicable staff. This includes:

Professional licenses (state medical, nursing, allied health)
DEA registrations
Board certifications (where required by privilege criteria)
Government exclusion and sanction status (OIG LEIE, SAM, state Medicaid exclusion lists)

The intent is straightforward: catch credential lapses, expirations, and exclusion events in near real-time rather than discovering them months or years after the fact.

This isn’t just a documentation change. It’s a fundamental shift from point-in-time verification to continuous credential assurance.

Why Monthly Credential Monitoring Matters More Than Ever

You might be thinking: “We already check credentials. Why does the frequency matter so much?”

Here’s why. A lot can happen between annual or biennial checks:

A physician’s state license can lapse due to a missed renewal.
A nurse practitioner can be added to the OIG exclusion list after a fraud conviction.
A provider’s DEA registration can be revoked following a disciplinary action.
Board certification can expire without the practitioner or your team noticing.

When any of these events go undetected, the consequences cascade:

Patient Safety Risk

An unlicensed or excluded practitioner providing care creates direct patient safety concerns. This is the Joint Commission’s primary motivation for the change.

Financial Exposure

Billing for services rendered by excluded providers can trigger False Claims Act liability. Under federal law, organizations that knowingly employ excluded individuals and bill federal healthcare programs face penalties of up to $100,000 per item or service, plus treble damages.

DOJ Corporate Enforcement Policy 2024 Update: What Changed for Compliance Programs

Accreditation Risk

Failing to meet JCAHO standards during a survey can result in citations, conditional accreditation, or loss of accreditation — which often triggers loss of Medicare/Medicaid participation.

Reputational Damage

Credentialing failures make headlines. A single incident involving an excluded or unlicensed provider can erode community trust and invite further regulatory scrutiny.

The bottom line: monthly monitoring isn’t bureaucratic overhead. It’s a core risk management function.

Your Complete JCAHO Monthly Credential Monitoring Checklist

Use this checklist to assess your current readiness and close any gaps before your next Joint Commission survey.

✅ Step 1: Inventory All Credentialed Practitioners and Staff

Before you can monitor credentials monthly, you need a complete, accurate roster.

Compile a master list of all privileged practitioners (physicians, dentists, podiatrists, advanced practice providers)
Include allied health professionals subject to credentialing under your medical staff bylaws
Include contracted and locum tenens providers — they are not exempt
Verify that your roster matches your HRIS and medical staff office records
Establish a process for adding new hires and removing departing staff in real time

Common gap: Many organizations discover discrepancies between HR records and credentialing files. Contracted providers and locums are frequently missed. Start here.

✅ Step 2: Define Your Monthly Monitoring Scope

Not every credential type requires the same monitoring approach. Map out what needs monthly checks.

State professional licenses (all states where provider is privileged)
DEA registrations
Board certifications (if required by your privilege delineation criteria)
OIG LEIE exclusion screening
SAM (System for Award Management) exclusion screening
OFAC screening (if applicable to your organization)
State Medicaid exclusion lists (for every state where you participate)
Any additional credential types required by your state regulations or payer contracts

Pro tip: Build a matrix that maps each practitioner type to the specific credentials requiring monthly verification. This becomes your monitoring blueprint.

✅ Step 3: Assess Your Current Verification Methods

How are you performing verifications today? Be honest about the gaps.

Document your current verification frequency for each credential type
Identify which verifications are manual vs. automated
Calculate the staff hours currently spent on credential verification per month
Identify any credential types that rely solely on practitioner self-reporting
Evaluate whether your current process uses primary source verification (PSV) or secondary sources

Reality check: If your team is manually checking state licensing board websites one by one, monthly monitoring for hundreds or thousands of providers is not sustainable. The math simply doesn’t work without automation or a managed service.

✅ Step 4: Establish Primary Source Verification Processes

The Joint Commission requires primary source verification — meaning you verify directly with the issuing body, not through the practitioner or an intermediary database that isn’t designated as a primary source equivalent.

Confirm that your license verification process queries the state licensing board directly (or a JCAHO-accepted equivalent)
Confirm that exclusion screening uses the actual OIG LEIE, SAM, and state exclusion databases — not a derivative
Document your PSV methodology for each credential type
Ensure your verification records capture the date, source, and result of each check

✅ Step 5: Implement Continuous Sanction and Exclusion Screening

Exclusion screening deserves special attention. Employing or contracting with an excluded individual — even unknowingly — creates significant liability under the False Claims Act.

Screen all credentialed practitioners against OIG LEIE monthly (at minimum)
Screen against SAM monthly
Screen against all applicable state Medicaid exclusion lists monthly
Screen against OFAC lists if your organization has international exposure
Ensure screening covers all workforce members, not just practitioners (OIG guidance recommends screening all employees, contractors, and vendors)
Implement a process for immediate action when a match is identified
Document your screening methodology, frequency, and results for audit purposes

Key consideration: False positives are the hidden cost of exclusion screening. Industry-standard screening tools can produce false positive rates above 90%, burying your team in manual review work. Look for solutions with precision algorithms that reduce false positives significantly — some purpose-built tools bring that rate down to 20-30%, saving hundreds of hours annually.

✅ Step 6: Build an Alert and Escalation Workflow

Monthly monitoring only works if you act on what you find. Detection without response is just expensive documentation.

Define escalation criteria: What findings trigger immediate action vs. further investigation?
Establish response timeframes for each alert type (e.g., exclusion match = immediate suspension of privileges pending investigation)
Assign clear ownership for each step in the escalation process
Create a communication protocol between credentialing, compliance, legal, and medical staff leadership
Document all actions taken in response to findings — the audit trail matters

Ethics Case Management Software Buyer’s Guide: 12 Must-Have Features for 2025

✅ Step 7: Centralize Your Credential Data

Scattered data creates blind spots. If license information lives in one system, exclusion screening results in another, and board certification records in a filing cabinet, you cannot maintain a reliable monthly cadence.

Consolidate all credential records into a single system of record
Ensure the system captures verification dates, sources, results, and expiration dates
Integrate with your HRIS so that roster changes flow automatically
Ensure the system supports audit-ready reporting — you need to prove compliance, not just achieve it

✅ Step 8: Automate Where Possible

Manual monthly monitoring at scale is a staffing problem you cannot hire your way out of.

Evaluate automated license monitoring solutions that perform continuous PSV
Evaluate automated sanction screening tools that process your full roster monthly (or more frequently)
Look for managed service models that handle the verification work on your behalf — freeing your team to focus on exceptions and escalations
Confirm that any automated solution provides the documentation and audit trail JCAHO surveyors expect

Scale context: Purpose-built credentialing solutions can process hundreds of names in one to two hours, with smaller batches completing in under an hour. Compare that to the days or weeks manual processes require.

✅ Step 9: Prepare for Survey Readiness

JCAHO surveys are unannounced. You need to be ready at all times, not just before an expected visit.

Maintain a real-time dashboard showing current credential status for all practitioners
Keep a rolling 12-month archive of monthly monitoring results
Document your policies and procedures for monthly monitoring, including scope, methodology, escalation, and corrective action
Conduct internal mock surveys quarterly to identify gaps before a surveyor does
Ensure your compliance officer and medical staff leadership can articulate your monitoring process clearly

✅ Step 10: Review and Improve Quarterly

Compliance isn’t a one-time project. Build in regular reviews.

Review monitoring results quarterly for trends (e.g., recurring lapse patterns, common credential types causing issues)
Assess whether your alert and escalation workflows are functioning as designed
Evaluate staff workload — is the process sustainable, or is your team drowning in manual work?
Update your monitoring scope if regulations, payer contracts, or organizational scope change
Benchmark your program against industry standards and peer organizations

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even well-intentioned credentialing programs stumble on these issues:

1. Monitoring only physicians. The JCAHO standards apply to all privileged practitioners and, depending on your bylaws, allied health professionals. Don’t forget advanced practice providers, CRNAs, and others.

2. Treating exclusion screening as a credentialing-only function. OIG guidance recommends screening your entire workforce — including non-clinical employees, contractors, and vendors. Your compliance program should own this, not just your medical staff office.

3. Relying on expiration date tracking alone. A license can be revoked or suspended before its expiration date. Monthly active verification catches mid-cycle changes that expiration tracking misses.

4. Ignoring state-level exclusion lists. Many organizations screen against the federal OIG LEIE and SAM but skip state Medicaid exclusion lists. This is a gap that surveyors and auditors will find.

5. Failing to document the process. If you can’t show a surveyor your methodology, frequency, results, and corrective actions, the monitoring might as well not have happened. Documentation is compliance.

How Technology Closes the Gap

Let’s be direct: the JCAHO 2025 monthly monitoring mandate is extremely difficult to meet with manual processes, especially for organizations with hundreds or thousands of practitioners.

The organizations that will thrive under these new requirements share a few characteristics:

They automate routine verifications so their credentialing staff can focus on exceptions, investigations, and practitioner relationships.
They use primary source verification tools that query licensing boards and exclusion databases directly, on a continuous basis.
They centralize credential data into a single platform that integrates with their HRIS and compliance systems.
They choose managed service models where the verification work is handled by specialists, and their internal team manages the results.
They demand financial accountability from their vendors — because when an exclusion is missed, the financial consequences are real.

Solutions purpose-built for healthcare credentialing can support over 20 verification types, reduce false positives dramatically, and provide the continuous monitoring cadence JCAHO now requires. Some even back their screening accuracy with financial guarantees — a meaningful differentiator when the cost of a miss can reach into the millions.

Key Takeaways

JCAHO 2025 requires monthly credential monitoring — not annual, not biennial. Monthly.
The scope is broad: licenses, DEA, board certifications, and exclusion/sanction screening across federal and state databases.
Manual processes don’t scale. If you have more than a handful of practitioners, automation or a managed service is essential.
Documentation is as important as the monitoring itself. If you can’t prove it to a surveyor, it didn’t happen.
Exclusion screening deserves special attention due to the severe financial penalties under the False Claims Act.
Start now. JCAHO surveys are unannounced. The time to close gaps is before the surveyor arrives, not after.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does JCAHO monthly credential monitoring actually require?

The Joint Commission’s 2025 standards require healthcare organizations to verify key practitioner credentials — including professional licenses, DEA registrations, board certifications, and exclusion/sanction status — on a monthly basis rather than relying solely on periodic re-credentialing cycles. The goal is near real-time detection of lapses, expirations, and exclusion events.

Does monthly monitoring apply to all employees or just physicians?

The credentialing monitoring requirements apply to all privileged practitioners, which typically includes physicians, dentists, podiatrists, and advanced practice providers. Depending on your medical staff bylaws, allied health professionals may also be in scope. For exclusion screening specifically, OIG guidance recommends monthly screening of your entire workforce, including non-clinical staff, contractors, and vendors.

Can we do JCAHO monthly credential monitoring manually?

Technically, yes. Practically, it’s extremely difficult at scale. Manually checking state licensing board websites, federal exclusion databases, and state Medicaid lists for every practitioner every month requires significant staff time. Most organizations with more than a small number of providers find that automated solutions or managed services are necessary to maintain the required cadence without overwhelming their teams.

What happens if we miss a lapsed or excluded credential?

The consequences range from JCAHO survey citations and potential loss of accreditation to significant financial penalties. Billing federal healthcare programs for services rendered by an excluded individual can trigger False Claims Act liability, with penalties up to $100,000 per item or service plus treble damages. There are also patient safety and reputational risks.

How do we reduce false positives in exclusion screening?

False positives are a major operational burden in sanction screening. Standard name-matching algorithms produce high false positive rates, sometimes above 90%. Purpose-built screening solutions use precision algorithms that can reduce false positives to 20-30%, dramatically cutting the time your team spends on manual review while maintaining screening accuracy.

Navigating the shift to monthly credential monitoring is a significant undertaking, but you don’t have to figure it out alone. If you’re evaluating how to meet the JCAHO 2025 requirements without burying your team in manual work, explore how continuous license monitoring and automated sanction screening can fit into your program.

Categories:

Regulatory Updates