Trending Now Q3: Hottest Topics in E&C and HR

When a fake social media profile using your employee’s photo triggers a compliance investigation that could end their career, traditional risk management playbooks become dangerously inadequate for today’s digital workplace challenges. The rapidly evolving compliance landscape presents both unprecedented challenges and strategic opportunities for ethics, compliance, and HR professionals. This quarterly roundup explores critical developments spanning social media investigations, organizational restructuring impacts, sanctions enforcement, False Claims Act expansion, and AI governance requirements. 

This episode of The Ethicsverse provides comprehensive analysis of five pivotal compliance trends affecting contemporary organizations. The discussion examines the complexities of social media-related employee investigations, particularly the challenge of synthetic allegations and the need for robust fact-checking protocols during high-pressure situations. The speakers explore how widespread corporate delayering and middle management elimination creates significant compliance vulnerabilities while simultaneously presenting opportunities for ethics programs to expand their organizational influence. A detailed sanctions enforcement case study illustrates how lucrative, time-sensitive deals can bypass compliance oversight, emphasizing the critical importance of embedding risk management controls within transaction processes. The conversation addresses the dramatic expansion of False Claims Act enforcement beyond traditional government contracting into areas including cybersecurity, import compliance, and civil rights violations. Finally, the experts analyze AI governance challenges, highlighting the gap between widespread employee AI adoption and formal corporate oversight mechanisms, while examining emerging regulatory frameworks in the EU and member states.

Featuring:

• Matt Kelly, CEO & Editor, Radical Compliance
• Karen Moore, Principal, Sounding Board Compliance LLC
• Nick Gallo, Chief Servant & Co-CEO, Ethico

Social Media Investigation Protocols Require Sophisticated Verification Systems

• Modern compliance teams must develop comprehensive fact-checking protocols to address the growing phenomenon of synthetic allegations and employee doxing.
• Organizations face significant legal exposure when making personnel decisions based on unverified social media posts, as demonstrated by cases where fake profiles have been created using employee photos.
• Companies should implement 48-72 hour cooling-off periods before taking action on social media complaints, allowing sufficient time for thorough investigation and verification of account authenticity.

Clear Social Media Policies Must Address Private Expression and Corporate Association

• Organizations need fair, clearly communicated social media policies that distinguish between inappropriate conduct and legitimate personal opinion expression.
• Employees increasingly separate their personal profiles from company identification, recognizing the potential for professional consequences from personal political or social commentary.
• Companies should provide immediate leadership communications during divisive events, emphasizing respectful discourse while acknowledging employees’ rights to personal opinions.

Middle Management Elimination Creates Critical Compliance Vulnerabilities

• The widespread corporate trend of eliminating middle managers fundamentally alters organizational risk profiles by removing key compliance enforcement layers.
• Remaining managers face dramatically increased spans of control, potentially managing 20+ direct reports instead of traditional team sizes of 5-6 employees.
• These overextended managers lack bandwidth to identify, address, or escalate compliance concerns effectively, creating gaps in the organizational risk management system.

Flattened Organizations Present Strategic Opportunities for Compliance Program Expansion

• Compliance teams can leverage organizational restructuring to position themselves as essential business partners supporting overloaded managers.
• The increased pressure on remaining managers creates compelling opportunities for ethics professionals to provide risk management support, training resources, and escalation pathways that help lighten management burdens.
• Compliance programs should proactively offer services like risk assessment guidance, policy interpretation support, and investigation assistance to demonstrate value during periods of organizational stress.

High-Pressure Deals Expose Critical Gaps in Transaction-Level Risk Controls

• The Treasury Department sanctions case against the Texas freight forwarding company illustrates how lucrative, time-sensitive opportunities can completely bypass compliance oversight mechanisms.
• Companies must implement hard controls requiring compliance approval before engaging new vendors or subcontractors, particularly in international transactions involving multiple jurisdictions.
• The “marshmallow test” phenomenon demonstrates how organizations succumb to short-term temptation despite knowing potential long-term consequences, emphasizing the need for systematic rather than discretionary compliance involvement.

Third-Party Risk Management Requires Deep Visibility Into Subcontracting Relationships

• Organizations must implement contract management systems that provide visibility into their vendors’ subcontracting relationships and business partnerships.
• The sanctions case revealed how primary vendors can unknowingly or intentionally subcontract work to prohibited entities, creating liability for the original contracting organization.
• Companies should require contractual notification and approval rights for any subcontracting arrangements, particularly in international transactions involving complex supply chains.

False Claims Act Enforcement Expansion Demands Comprehensive Risk Assessment Updates

• The dramatic expansion of False Claims Act enforcement beyond traditional government contracting creates compliance exposure across virtually all industries and business functions.
• Organizations must urgently reassess their risk profiles, as activities previously considered low-risk may now constitute significant enforcement targets, including import classification errors, cybersecurity deficiencies, and civil rights violations.
• The introduction of administrative enforcement mechanisms for smaller claims ($150,000-$1 million) means companies face increased scrutiny from multiple federal agencies beyond the Department of Justice.

Whistleblower Program Enhancement Becomes Critical for Internal Resolution

• Organizations must strengthen internal reporting systems to encourage would-be whistleblowers to raise concerns internally rather than pursuing external qui tam actions.
• Data consistently shows that over 90% of external whistleblower cases involved multiple previous internal reporting attempts that were inadequately addressed by the organization.
• Companies should emphasize robust anti-retaliation protections, anonymous reporting options, and dignified treatment of individuals raising concerns to prevent external escalation.

Product Design Cybersecurity Standards Now Fall Under False Claims Act Scrutiny

• The Illumina DNA sequencer enforcement action establishes a precedent for False Claims Act violations based on inadequate cybersecurity measures embedded in product design from inception.
• Organizations selling technology products to government agencies must implement security-by-design principles to avoid potential fraud allegations related to delivering inherently vulnerable systems.
• The enforcement focus on design-level security deficiencies rather than operational security lapses represents a fundamental shift requiring compliance programs to engage with product development processes.

AI Governance Programs Must Address Widespread Unauthorized Employee Usage

• Organizations face the reality that approximately 80% of employees are already using generative AI tools outside of any corporate oversight or control mechanisms.
• Compliance teams must implement practical AI governance frameworks that acknowledge current usage patterns while establishing appropriate guardrails and risk management controls.
• The challenge involves balancing employee productivity benefits with data protection, intellectual property, and regulatory compliance concerns across multiple jurisdictions with varying AI regulatory approaches.

Conclusion