Meeting Joint Commission, CMS, and State Board Requirements: Your Compliance Roadmap

Read time: 3-4 minutes

Healthcare organizations must navigate overlapping and sometimes conflicting regulatory expectations for credential monitoring. The Joint Commission, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and state licensing boards each maintain specific requirements that credentialing programs must satisfy.

Understanding these requirements helps organizations build monitoring programs that don’t just meet minimum standards but demonstrate sophisticated compliance management that withstands regulatory scrutiny.

The Joint Commission’s 2025 Standards

The Joint Commission’s updated guidance represents the most significant credentialing change in years. Key requirements include:

Monthly Verification Frequency
Medical staff licenses, advanced practice provider licenses, nursing licenses, and DEA registrations require monthly verification for all credentialed professionals providing patient care. This frequency ensures organizations identify credential changes before they become patient safety or compliance issues.

Primary Source Verification
Verification must come directly from licensing authorities—state medical boards, nursing boards, DEA. The Joint Commission explicitly states that third-party databases or professional self-reporting don’t satisfy requirements unless verified as primary sources. Documentation must show direct contact with issuing authorities.

Timely Action on Changes
When credentials lapse, face sanctions, or encounter disciplinary action, organizations must take immediate action. Joint Commission surveyor guidance indicates “immediate” means days, not weeks. Practice privileges should be suspended pending investigation and resolution.

Complete Documentation Standards
Surveyor expectations include:

• Timestamped verification records showing monthly checks occurred
• Documentation of primary source contact for each verification
• Evidence of appropriate action when issues arose
• Clear audit trails demonstrating systematic processes
• Remediation plans when credential problems were identified

During surveys, Joint Commission reviewers sample credential files to assess process consistency. Organizations should be able to produce instantly:

• Verification logs showing monthly checks for all credentialed staff
• Primary source documentation for sampled professionals
• Action plans when credential issues were identified
• Evidence that issues were resolved before professionals resumed practice

CMS Conditions of Participation

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services maintains Conditions of Participation (CoPs) that healthcare organizations must meet to receive federal reimbursement. Under 42 CFR 482.12, credentialing requirements include:

Initial Verification Before Practice
Before professionals provide patient care, organizations must verify current licenses, relevant training, and board certifications. Initial verification must be documented with primary source confirmation and retained in credentialing files.

Ongoing Monitoring Processes
While CMS doesn’t explicitly specify monthly verification frequency, CoPs require organizations to have processes ensuring only currently licensed professionals provide care. Given that licenses can lapse or be sanctioned at any time, most compliance experts interpret this as requiring at least monthly monitoring for high-risk credentials.

Qualified Credentialing Staff
CMS expects credentialing to be conducted by appropriately trained staff with designated oversight. Automated systems don’t replace credentialing professional responsibilities—they enable more effective execution and ensure consistency.

Documentation Retention
CMS State Operations Manual guidance indicates credential verification documentation should be retained and readily accessible for survey purposes. Organizations must be able to demonstrate ongoing monitoring occurred throughout the survey period.

State Licensing Board Expectations

State medical boards, nursing boards, and other licensing authorities maintain their own requirements and conduct facility audits. While specifics vary by state, common expectations include:

Current License Verification
Facilities must ensure all practicing professionals hold current, valid licenses in the state where they practice. Penalties for employing unlicensed practitioners are severe.

Disciplinary Action Awareness
Organizations should know if credentialed professionals face licensing board investigations or disciplinary actions. The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) maintains that most state boards provide public databases of investigations and sanctions that healthcare facilities are expected to monitor.

Multi-State Practice Compliance
With telemedicine expansion, many professionals practice across state lines. Organizations must verify licenses in all states where professionals provide care—not just their primary practice state. The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact facilitates multi-state licensing but doesn’t eliminate verification requirements.

Reporting Obligations
Some states require healthcare facilities to report when credentialed professionals’ licenses lapse or face sanctions. Failure to report can result in facility penalties separate from those for employing unlicensed practitioners.

For multi-state healthcare systems, this creates operational complexity. A physician might need licenses verified in three states, each with different renewal cycles, board interfaces, and reporting requirements. Automated monitoring that handles multi-state verification becomes essential rather than optional.

DEA Registration Requirements

DEA registration verification requires particular attention due to controlled substance implications:

Verification Frequency and Documentation
DEA registrations must be verified as part of monthly credential monitoring for prescribing practitioners. The DEA Practitioner’s Manual (2022 Edition) emphasizes that healthcare facilities bear responsibility for ensuring prescribers maintain current registration.

Status Checking Process
DEA maintains a verification system at https://apps.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/webforms2/spring/main allowing organizations to confirm current registration status. Documentation should show regular checking against this primary source with timestamps and verification results.

Expiration Management
DEA registrations typically require renewal every three years. Organizations need systems tracking expiration dates and ensuring prescribing practitioners maintain current registrations without lapses.

Immediate Action on Lapse
If a DEA registration lapses, prescribing privileges must be suspended immediately. Any controlled substance prescriptions written during a lapsed period create significant liability for both the practitioner and the facility. ECRI Institute’s 2024 patient safety analysis identified several sentinel events linked to prescribing with expired DEA registrations.

National Practitioner Data Bank Integration

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is a federal repository of information about healthcare practitioners’ license actions, clinical privileges restrictions, and malpractice payments.

Healthcare organizations must:

• Query NPDB during initial credentialing
• Query at least every two years for recredentialing
• Report adverse actions affecting clinical privileges or professional society memberships

The NPDB Guidebook (2020 Edition) specifies that while NPDB queries aren’t required monthly, organizations should have processes ensuring NPDB information informs ongoing monitoring decisions. Integration between credential monitoring systems and NPDB reporting ensures organizations capture required information without separate manual processes.

Board Certification Considerations

While board certification isn’t always legally required, many organizations require it for certain roles, and it significantly affects privileging decisions:

Verification Requirements
If your organization requires board certification for credentialing or privileging, it must be verified from the relevant specialty board. The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and American Osteopathic Association (AOA) maintain online verification systems that satisfy primary source requirements.

Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
Most specialty boards now require ongoing MOC activities including continuing medical education, practice assessment, and periodic examination. Credentialing systems should track MOC status and requirements, not just initial certification status.

Expiration and Renewal Cycles
Board certifications expire and require renewal—typically every 7-10 years depending on specialty. Monitoring systems should track board certification expiration dates separately from licenses, as they follow different timelines.

Practical Compliance Strategies

Meeting regulatory requirements while maintaining operational efficiency requires:

Risk-Based Monitoring Frequencies
While high-risk clinical credentials need monthly verification, organizations can justify different frequencies for lower-risk credentials based on documented risk assessment:

• Monthly: Medical licenses, NP/PA licenses, RN licenses, DEA registrations (required by Joint Commission)
• Quarterly: Allied health certifications, therapy licenses, technical certifications
• Annually: Administrative certifications, low-risk support staff credentials

Increase risk program participation with simplified workflows: When monitoring frequencies align with actual risk, compliance burden decreases while regulatory protection increases. Documentation should clearly articulate your risk-based rationale.

Integrated Privileging Decisions
Credential status should automatically inform practice privilege decisions. If a license lapses, scheduling systems should immediately flag the professional as unable to practice until credentials are resolved. This integration prevents the scenario where compliance knows about a credential issue but operations doesn’t.

Proactive Renewal Management
Rather than discovering expired credentials during verification, leading organizations implement renewal workflows:

1. 60-day advance notification to professional and supervisor
2. 30-day escalated reminder if no renewal action documented
3. 14-day critical alert to department leadership and compliance
4. Automatic privilege suspension if credential expires
5. Documentation tracking once renewal occurs
6. Return-to-practice clearance after verification

According to HCAA 2024 benchmark data, organizations with structured renewal workflows prevent 85-90% of potential credential lapses through advance notification and proactive management.

Cross-Functional Coordination
Credentialing, medical staff office, HR, and compliance need shared access to current credential information to ensure coordinated response. Boost compliance team impact by offering customized views to different stakeholders—each sees information relevant to their role without accessing unnecessary data.

Audit Preparation Documentation
Maintain readily accessible documentation that regulators commonly request:

• Monthly verification completion reports for the past 24 months
• Credential files for sampled professionals showing complete history
• Action plans and remediation when credential issues occurred
• Evidence of primary source verification with timestamps
• Proof that practice privileges were suspended during credential lapses

Organizations that prepare this documentation proactively respond to survey requests in under one hour rather than scrambling for days during active surveys.

Common Compliance Pitfalls to Avoid

Based on White & Case’s 2024 analysis of enforcement actions and Joint Commission findings, common credentialing failures include:

Relying on Third-Party Databases
Some organizations use aggregator databases claiming to provide credential verification. Unless these databases pull directly from primary sources with documentation proving primary source access, they don’t satisfy regulatory requirements.

Inconsistent Verification Frequency
Organizations that verify some professionals monthly while others remain on annual cycles without documented risk-based rationale face surveyor questions about whether processes are systematic or arbitrary.

Documentation Gaps
Knowing that verification occurred but lacking documentation is nearly as problematic as not verifying. Regulators evaluate what can be proven, not what organizations claim happened.

Delayed Action on Findings
Discovering that a credential lapsed but allowing the professional to continue practicing while “working on renewal” creates massive liability. Privileges must be suspended immediately upon discovery.

Missing Multi-State Verification
Professionals providing telemedicine or practicing at multiple facilities across state lines require verification in all relevant states. Missing a state creates exposure if that license lapsed.

Key Takeaways

• Joint Commission requires monthly verification with primary source documentation
• CMS Conditions of Participation mandate ongoing monitoring processes
• DEA registrations require particular attention due to controlled substance implications
• Multi-state practice demands comprehensive verification across all relevant jurisdictions
• Risk-based monitoring frequencies are acceptable with documented rationale
• Proactive renewal management prevents 85-90% of potential credential lapses
• Cross-functional integration ensures coordinated response when issues arise

Moving Forward

The regulatory landscape for credential monitoring continues evolving toward more frequent verification, enhanced documentation expectations, and greater accountability. Organizations that implement robust, automated credential monitoring systems now will be positioned for whatever regulatory changes emerge next.

Those relying on manual processes, annual verification cycles, or outdated systems face mounting operational burden and regulatory risk. The question is no longer whether to automate credential monitoring—it’s how quickly you can implement systems that protect your organization, your patients, and your staff.